Re: [tied] Re: Romanian ge > $

From: alexmoeller@...
Message: 15624
Date: 2002-09-19

----- Original Message -----
From: "g" <gs001ns@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:36 PM
Subject: [tied] Re: Romanian ge > $



>[Moeller] yeap.
>frânge= lat frangere, scurge=lat excurrere, strânge=lat
>stringere

What? Those verbs I had mentioned aren't substrat ones, but
Latin? Amazing! :)

George

[Moeller] yeap:-(((
this put serious questions about the substrate in your Banat
dialect:-)))) hehehe