Re: [tied] Re: *gwistis

----- Original Message -----
From: "g" <gs001ns@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 7:50 PM
Subject: [tied] Re: *gwistis


>[Moeller] well explain me the form of deSti in rom and giSt
in
>albanian with the same "St" of your latin digitus. Did in
>albanian gi from latin went too St?

Rather di- > gi-. There it's the first gi-, not the
second -gi-/-ge-.
The second one turns /S/. (Perhaps in the same way as in
Transylvanian
subdialects de/di > ghe/ghi (actually g^e/g^i; or, if gi
/dZi/,
as in the Banat Rumanian subdialect, right, bãgitzã? :-)

George

[Moeller] Let see first "bade". Bade is pronounced in these
subdialects baghe and not bage.. there is too big the
confusion of bage with " bage"= to put in. I did not heard
bage, but baghe. I do not say it is said somewhere "bage",
just I did not heard it.