Re: [tied] Re: slavic methathesis

From: Sergejus Tarasovas
Message: 15511
Date: 2002-09-16

Message
A self-correction:
*or > *orU > *or/*oro, then *oro > *ro
-----Original Message-----
From: Sergejus Tarasovas [mailto:S.Tarasovas@...]
Sent: 2002 m. rugsÄ—jo 16 d. 11:17
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [tied] Re: slavic methathesis

Some scholars think so (or postulate slightly different scenario: *or > *orU > *or/*oro).
 
Sergei
 
>> Wouldn't it be possible to argue for (without loss of generality):
*or > *oro > *ro etc, so that pleophony becomes an intermediate
stage? If so, it would be one, not separate developments.


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Previous in thread: 15510
Next in thread: 15515
Previous message: 15510
Next message: 15512

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts