From: alexmoeller@...
Message: 15388
Date: 2002-09-11
----- Original Message -----
From: "George" <gs001ns@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:03 PM
Subject: [tied] Rum. k' and g' + e/i [Re: -ishte, -eshte]
>A. Is the smaller, widespread change basically s > S before
ke, ki,
>te, ti?
Yes (because of these clusters schi-/sche- and sci-/sce-.
Especially
the latter group seems to be difficult for most of Romanian
native-
speakers to be pronounced s-tS-.
[Moeller]
I forgot to say that there in romanan not always went "schi"
and "sche" but "skî" too. That shows somehow a much distance
to sht.
scînteia, scînci, scîrliontz, scîrba... etc.. sorry for
disturbing your way to argue about "sche" and "schi"..