From: alexmoeller@...
Message: 15332
Date: 2002-09-09
----- Original Message -----
From: "Piotr Gasiorowski" <piotr.gasiorowski@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] -ishte, -eshte
.
>
> In verbs (the fourth conjugation, I think), <-$t-> is simply
the palatalised counterpart of <-sc-> before front-vowel
endings: cf. Lat. nascor > It. nascere, Rom. se na$te.
>
> Piotr
[Moeller]
It is a good example Piotr. I almost forgot about it but you
rememberd to me now. In romanian is word with unknown
ethymology as fallow:
a nãscoci= to invent something, , to make something, to create
something, to imagine untrue things semanticaly to give if I
am allowed to say so, "to give birth " to something, a ideea,
a thing, but never to give birth to a baby.
This is very , very appropiate to latin "nascro" and from
semantic, what can I say, "a nashte" in romanian is not used
just for give birth to babies but too to invent something and
all the stuff i explained for " a nãscoci"