From: george knysh
Message: 15315
Date: 2002-09-09
>****GK: You are quite right. This alternative
> >******%%%%%%GK: I doubt very much the appearance
> had anything to do
> >with the original name. Note that as to Bilhorod
> Dnistrovs'kyj, there
> >is good evidence that at one point there were two
> fortresses in the
> >area, a "white" one and a "black" one. Here the
> colours refer to
> >geography, "white" indicating "west" (quite proper
> for a right bank
> >location) and "black" east. When Moldavians and
> Turks built up
> >Bilhorod, they may well have given it that "white"
> appearance you
> >mention. I don't think this was the case in the
> 10th century. There
> >were other "Bilhorods" in Slavic territories (and
> the Kyivan one was
> >also called thus because of location, not colour
> per se).*******
>
> In Turkic contexts, also to be verified "kara"
> (subordinate) and
> "ak" (free; chief) realities, i.e. administrative
> entities. (cf. Sz�kes-
> feh�rv�r = a "white" city & old capital of Hungary;
> Gyulafeh�rv�r
> = B@... = Alba Iulia = the old capital of
> Transylvania (starting as
> such under a Turkic chieftain related to the
> Arpadian royal house;
> also cf. N�ndorfeh�rv�r = Belgrad = Beograd =
> Serbia's capital).
>
> George
>__________________________________________________
>