From: alexmoeller@...
Message: 15251
Date: 2002-09-07
----- Original Message -----
From: "george knysh" <gknysh@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Toponymy and ethnic Realities at the Lower
Danube by Brezeanu Stelian
> ******GK: The best short account of the history of
> Bilhorod Dnistrovs'kyj is a Russian language article
> by M. Shlapak which can be found at the city's
> official website: [WARNING!!! See below before
> clicking]
> http://www.tira2500.org/?go=history/stcon
. 1362,
> and from the Lithuanians by the Moldavians in ca.
> 1377/1378; then from the Moldavians by the Turks in
> 1484, and three centuries later by the Russians.It was
> part of Rumania after 1918, then went to the U.S.S.R.
> in 1940 (more temporary shifts during WW II) and is
> now in Ukraine. Shlapak's article points out that the
> identification of the later Bilhorod with the 10th c.
> "ruined city" of Aspron is very doubtful.
[Moeller]
aaamm.. so bad the article is not in english to read. For the
people who cannot beginn anything with russian, which should
be the reasons of doubt for the relation Aspron=Bilhorod?I
just would should like to put them in a paralel view with the
arguments of Brezeanu.
Begining with middle of XIV centuries the topic is not more of
a very big interers for be, but until then, a lot:-)