From: George S t a n a
Message: 15215
Date: 2002-09-06
>[Moeller] George, please do not put the nobles here. They haveSo do I. On top of that, I talk of... my region, the history
>had a big reason to became magyars. I speak about folk.
>And I know that in hungarian folk today are just slavs, germans,Aha, so you admit that Hungarians assimilated Oláhs (Romanians),
>olahs and what I dont know what for folks.
>from the ancient Magyars there you will do -nt find the genesWho told you this?
>of them in 10.000 people.
>So I dont speak about this protion . I speak about theThat what you'd like to convey should read: "The Hungarians
>phenomen in its whole. The folk did not became magyarized.
>That is the first conclusion everyone seen in the 17-18-19That's quite bad, namely to underline the situation of these
>centuries.
>That a part did, some went, some got reach, someYou better start learning a bit more of the history of our
>got sick, that are details for percentage which are not
>relevant for the whole ansamble.
>[Moeller]Piotr is well aware of the whole stuff, even without having
>Iif you do not fallow the thread I cannot help you. The map
>was for Piotr to look at it with his own eyes for forms with
>"apa" in thracian space..that first.
>The toponyms are not denied. But the discution was aboutYou don't get it. That's why you go on insisting on that KW > P,B,
>kW > p(b) in thracian . Some things go too quick in the past,
>even if recent past:-)