From: George S t a n a
Message: 15172
Date: 2002-09-06
>[Moeller] yeap. And the olah did not maghyarized.. Why?Actually, highly numerous Romanians got magyarized. The Romanian
> > Roughly the modern territory of Macedonia, southern SerbiaPapperlapapp! As a true Traco-Dacist worshipper, you should
>and western Bulgaria. That's what I'd put my money on. The
>Albanians also originated somewhere within this area.
>
>[Moeller] because of "Durmitor and the rest of toponimes more
>there and beacuse there should be found Albanians of course.
>I will sugest you to take a look at how old are the qwords whichYour recommendation is superfluous: you've already been told on
>are common in romanian and albanian. This will show you for
>yourself that we have here pre-roman times.
>For a John Normal Buyer as me, I have to hear what say a lingvistFor whom repetitio mater studiorum non est. ;)
>sometimes :-))
>[Moeller]you will tell me thath "th" and "dh" of allbanias is[Am Thema vorbei, meen Jong! :-]
>related to romanian?Do you really talk about the fonetism of
>the romanian and albanian language? Have you heard an albanian
>speaking in his native language? But a romanian? So "maza:re"
>naparcaAdd that it has a correspondent in Albanian: ne(t)përkë.
>1) lat. Anguis Fragilis, lizard
>2) popular=viper Expr. "pui de naparca"= very bad guy
>3) a small and thin boat for navigation. mm. there is a sens
>more I will tell you in erman, my english let me die here.
>About the rest of toponyms and hydronims. Do you will let meFor what reason? Those who contest the continuity of Romanians
>post a big map here on files? Is indeed 1,5 MB but a excelent
>quality. You will see for yourself. May I?