Re: [tied] Re: just verifying a point

----- Original Message -----
From: "George S t a n a" <gs001ns@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 3:31 PM
Subject: [tied] Re: just verifying a point


Alex wrote:


These are a bit artificially made sentences. But, OTOH, made
of
common words. Either assumed to be derivations of from
the ancient Dacian or Thracian vocabulary. Or with uncertain
or unknown etymology. All this wording is seen by Mr Vinereanu
& al. as being __exclusively__ "autochtonous", i.e. either
from
Dacian or Thracian -- without any mediation by a third idiom.

[Moeller] not George. Mr Vinereanu does not give any sentences
in his book.Not a single one, not even two words. . Nothing.
The sentences are made by my ill brain. I was looking in the
romanian DEX and I was surprised to see how alive these words
are and that indeed you cann make sentences with. This is what
made me to look around for explanations. And here begun all.
Here begun to quake all what I knew about dacians, latin and
stuff. I begun to read to discover what about. And I paid a
very much attention from that point to the romanian
substratum. Because its volume and daily usage is , indeed,
amazing..