Re: [tied] Morphology (3/20)

From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 14502
Date: 2002-08-24

On Sat, 24 Aug 2002 16:33:53 +0200, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:

>What is actually attested is:
>
>(B) *[é]-o: *[é]-omes
> *[é]-es *[é]-ete(s)
> *[é]-et *[é]-ont

What is actually attested is:

(B) *[é]-o: *[é]-omes
*[é]-esi *[é]-ete(s)
*[é]-eti *[é]-onti


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...