From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 14390
Date: 2002-08-19
>[Moeller] not only that one Thorsten. There is an imensity of words inApparently, you have never seen an etymological dictionary of French, Italian or
>romanian which ar supposed to come from latin ( most of them rightly)
>but a lot are form fantesist popular latin word.
>For instance " to learn" into romanian is [i:nva:t,a] supposed to come
>from a funny in-vitiare ( to viciate)
>an another could be a scutura where it was necesary to invente an latin
>*excutulare, where in fact latin have had the "quatio" for this one
>I dont want to make a big list here, I dont have the space for it. ButRubbish. The numerals are inherited, the names of the months are learned
>we should have to take a look at the simple things like numerals. For
>instance eight and ten.
>They could never ever come from latin because normaly into romanian the
>latin word "octo" should give perfectly into romanian "opt" . the same
>,ten, "dece" should give "zece". So is it , into romanian we have opt
>and zece .But we have the months octombrie and decembrie .The difference
>here is that octombrie and decembrie we know for sure trhey are latin
>words ( rumanians old words are gustar and gerar) so the opt and zece
>are supposed to come from latin. The comparation among octombrie /octo
>/opt and decembrie /dece /zece shows that the romanins got something
>from latin ( the months) but not the opt and zece ( the numerals)