Geoff:
>I don't think I implied that it was of specifically Kaskian origin; it is
>of /common/ NWC/Kaskian/Hattic (?) origin, hence the 'linguistic
>continuum' thesis.
Whether you claim it to be Kaskian or you claim it to be of
"NWC/Kaskian/Hattic" origin, you're still making a fatal assumption that
Kaskian is implicated in all of this. What gives you this impression?
(And how many times do I have to ask this question before I get frustrated
by your suspicious lack of clear response?)
- gLeN
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx