Re: [tied] Re: Slavic hawk-word

My fault. It's my ambition to be as accurate as Trubachev, but e-mails are too often written in haste. Correct 1953 to 1931 for the article below, but it's his 1953 article in BSLP#49 ("Le nom de l'"autour" [cf. astur, PG] en slave") that lays out the "hawk" etymology. Sorry for this unnecessary confusion.

Piotr

----- Original Message -----
From: Sergejus Tarasovas

To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 5:52 PM

Subject: [tied] Re: Slavic hawk-word

What puzzles me is that Trubachev (usually accurate as to references), commenting on Vey's etymology (in just some words that don't clarify anything, including his opinion on that) in two different books makes the same reference (BSLP#49 (1953), 24-40). Was this Society so productive as to publish at least 17 (!) issues during a year?