Re: [tied] xodit'

On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 22:21:24 -0000, "Sergejus Tarasovas"
<S.Tarasovas@...> wrote:

>--- In cybalist@..., "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...> wrote:
>> Mmm... What about *nesti, *le^zti, *plyti, *vesti (*vez-), *vesti
>(*ved-), etc. vs. *nositi, *laziti, *plavati, *voziti, *voditi? Is
>there anything "sessive" about the latter series? The difference is
>between one continuous action and iterative movement ("around", "up
>and down", "to and fro"). How does one sit to and fro?
>>
>
>But where is that **xosti?

That should have been (but isn't) **s^e^sti.

For "sessive", there is se^sti ~ saditi (causative, not iterative) ~
se^de^ti (durative).