Re: Question from the back row (Was Re: [tied] Finnish hevonen "hor

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 10802
Date: 2001-10-31

From a proterokinetic u-stem alternation like *gWoh3u-/*gWh3ou-, we get *gWô:us (originally disyllabic with initial stress, hence the circumflex), gen.sg. *gWous < *gWh3ou-s, loc.sg. *gWowi < *gWh3ow-i, nom.pl. *gWo:wes < *gWoh3-ow-es, more or less as reflected in Old Indic. Slavic derivatives containing *gov- would be based on the oblique stem *gWow- < *gWh3-ow-. The laryngeal (when it still existed) caused syllabification problems; this is why the reduced form *gW(h3)u- > *g(W)w- is rarely attested except in some compounds and derivatives like Toch. A ki < *gw-ih2- and Gk. (hekatom-)be: < *-gw-ah2.
 
Piotr
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Sergejus Tarasovas
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:18 AM
Subject: Question from the back row (Was Re: [tied] Finnish hevonen "horse"

--- In cybalist@......, "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@......> wrote:
>
*gWeh3-u- (if this is how *gWou- 'cow' is to be analysed).

If so, why does Slavic fail to reflect h3 in, eg, *gove,do (**gav-
would be expected)?  *gWeh3-u- > *gWoh3u- > *gWo-h3u- > *gWou- ?