From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
Message: 9531
Date: 2001-09-16
>--- In cybalist@..., Miguel Carrasquer Vidal <mcv@...> wrote:Indeed. I merely meant to stress that the field is a highly complex
>> Yes. I was referring to the accent at the time of PIE Nullstufe (to
>> explain zero-grade in Greek, full-grade in Baltic, and probably
>> Armenian). The road from PIE accentuation to Balto-Slavic
>> accentuation is a difficult one, passing through changes known as
>> Dolobko's, Dybo's, Ebeling's, Endzeli:n's, Fortunatov's, Georgiev's,
>> Hartmann's, Hirt's, Hjelmslev's, Illich-Svitych's, Kortlandt's,
>> Leskien's, Meillet's, Nieminen's, Pedersen's, Saussure's,
>Shaxmatov's,
>> Stang's, van Wijk's and other Laws.
>
>An impressive list (one would wish to add Kuryl/owicz and Stang). A
>honest remark would be that most of the _conceptions_ (not just laws)
>behind those names (the correct spelling of one of which is of course
>Endzeli:ns) are mutually exclusive rather than mutually completing.
>Speaking seriously, as there are a number of theories connecting theThe stressed root prevents Nullstufe. Whether the vowel under the
>emergence of PIE /*o/ with the stress, why exactly the stressed root
>could help /*o/ to be born in your opinion?