Re: [tied] Helmand = Sarasvati.

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 9407
Date: 2001-09-12

There are no strictly orthodox views in this case ;). Personally, I find this identification, supported by a number of Indologists on linguistic and philological grounds, very attractive.
 
Piotr
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: markodegard@...
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:21 PM
Subject: [tied] Helmand = Sarasvati.

> Food for thought:
>
> http://www.picatype.com/dig/dc/dc0aa03.htm
>
> Piotr

Indeed. Does this represent the orthodox view?

Rajesh Kochhar (the web site's author) writes:

--start quote--
this paper argues that the bulk of the Rigveda was
composed on the banks of the river Helmand; the
Ghaggar was already defunct when the Indo-Aryans
encountered it; and that many rivers to the east of
Satluj (Sarasvati, Yamuna, Ganga, Gomati and Sarayu)
were given Rigvedic names for the sake of nostalgia.
--end quote--

He suggests archaeological digs in the Helmand catchment. The
political situation there, however, precludes such a worthy effort.

Elsewhere, he states in re the Harappans:

--start quote--
Studies show that the monsoon was particularly heavy
in the period c. 8000-2000 BC. About 1600 BC the wet
period ended abruptly and was followed by a long
drought
--end quote--

This touches on another interest of mine, how climate has affected
history. The Helmand catchment would have likely suffered
aridification too, provoking migrations eastward.




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.