From: Glen Gordon
Message: 8660
Date: 2001-08-22
>From: "Glen Gordon" <glengordon01@...>_________________________________________________________________
>Reply-To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
>To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [tied] Tyrrhenian and its relation to IE
>Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:57:54
>
>
>Pat is confused again so I'll be concise:
>
>In IndoTyrrhenian,
> the nominative marked the subject/patient,
> the accusative marked the object,
> and the genitive marked the agent.
>
>Example: Burushaski where both subject-object and agent-patient
>relationships are also conveyed.
>
> > A typical confusion. The functional equivalent of the accusative is
>the
> >absolutive.
>
>Since the patient and the object are two different things, the
>absolutive and accusative cases are definitely not functionally
>equivalent. Therefore, Pat must be mad.
>
>When I arrive home, I'll find Kerns' quote on the Nostratic
>postclitic *ma which Pat cannot find it at his impoverished
>library.
>
>-------------------------------------------------
> gLeNny gEe
> ...wEbDeVEr gOne bEsErK!
>
> home: http://glen_gordon.tripod.com
> email: glengordon01@...
>-------------------------------------------------
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>