From: MrCaws@...
Message: 8532
Date: 2001-08-15
> --- In cybalist@..., MrCaws@... wrote:historical
> > --- In cybalist@..., cas111jd@... wrote:
> >
> > Myth is filled with
> > legendary half-truths that aren't usually accurate in a
> > snese, but nonetheless have an underlying factual basis of somethe
> >
> > Aeneas makes a good case and point. The tradition making Aeneas
> > legendary patriarch of Rome etc. is obviously not historicalfact.
> > Connections between the Romans and Trojans are prettylegendary
> > fanciful.However, the Etruscans, whatever you believe about them,
> >did
> > have significant cultural influence(maybe more than that) from W
> > Anatolia. If you notice that the Roman culture borrowed a lot of
> > their ideas from the Etruscans, it seems not unlikely that this
> >tale
> > might refer to the good old Rasna, retouched to meet Roman
> >needs.That
> > there is some truth there, even if it is obscured by its
> > nature and nationalistic sentiment. Skeptics might look at thepart
> > discussing how some of Aeneas' companions ended up settling atactual
> > Sardinia. Connections between Etruscans and Sardinia are pretty
> > numerous. Of course, theis is not to say that Aeneas was an
> > guy, but is shows how similar traditions can have something tosay
> >ifyour
> > looked at critially.
> Connections between Etruscans and Carthage also abound. There's
> Dido episode.True that. In fact, Carthage and Etruria did have a sort of stormy
> If he was actual, he might have spoken a form of Lemnian. Thatwould
> make him an Etruscan on arrival in Italy. So the Aeneas story isthe
> story of an Etruscan founding the city of Rome (or of Etruria?)Yes, I would say the latter. I don't buy Aeneas as a single person,