From: Glen Gordon
Message: 8489
Date: 2001-08-14
>>No, but how about Etruscan (and Lemnian) *as- "god"How about what now? This word doesn't even exist. The word for
> > No, but how about Etruscan (and Lemnian) *as- "god", the Yaz-_________________________________________________________________
>people, "iron" (aes) people, and your own theory of Goths as casters
>and founders? (yes I know about the /n/ in *ansuz, but how about
>nasalisation in the other cognates?)
>
>What "other cognates"? What "cognates" in the first place? Iranian
>yaz- has nothing to do with *h2ajes- ("aes"), and *as- : *ansu- is
>not what you might call a compelling equation.
>
>
> > Where I come from, a story is either true or false. I don't
>understand Klingenbergs epistemology: What exactly is "non-history"
>and in italics at that)? The question is: Is Snorri's story of Odin
>true or false?
>
>OK, it's _factually_ false. It is evidently a late construct -- a
>piece of literary fiction, inspired partly by Germanic traditions,
>partly by Graeco-Roman influences, and framed in a Christian context.
>
> > Klingenberg does not answer that question, he just assumes as
>obvious that he did.
>
>Did you read the article or just the summary I quoted?
>
> > Therefore: the question is open and Snorri's stories are as true as
>those of Herodotus, as far as I'm concerned
>
>What can I say to such a dogmatic statement of your uncritical trust
>in Snorri? "As far as I'm concerned" is the key phrase here.
>Unfortunately, many people won't take your word for it.
>
>
>Piotr
>
>
>
>