From: tgpedersen@...
Message: 8471
Date: 2001-08-13
>to "style"
> > From the little I know of Celtic languages, with respect
> > they fit the stereotypical description of things Celtic:paradigms,
> Extravagant,
> > when not downright suppletive then extremely complicated
> athan
> > typical elite language, that it would take a lifetime to learn
> > properly
>
> Come on - nearly every IE language takes a considerable amount of
> time to learn properly, with even some native speakers never truly
> mastering the language in their lifetimes (usually based on their
> education level). Celtic languages are certainly no more harder
> Russian or Czech, and I really don't know how you can call Celticknowledge
> langauges typically "elite". I think your admitted lack of
> of Celtic linguistics forces you to see more complexity in themthan
> they actually possess.heart),
>
> > (and I am pretty sure a good deal of the decade-long
> > education of druids included Pan.nini-like rules learnt by
> > the kind of language students flee from at school, if they haveany
> > other interest than language for language's sake. And alsodo
> > diversified - each Celtic tribe would have a linguistic axe to
> grind
> > with the neighbor tribe.
>
> <chuckling> What would possibly make you think that? What evidence
> you have of this? Do you have a linguistic axe to grind with YOURWell, I don't have Celtic neighbors. But this is what Holger Pedersen
> nighbors?
>Torsten
> - Chris Gwinn