From: markodegard@...
Message: 8436
Date: 2001-08-10
--- In cybalist@..., "Joseph S Crary" <pva@...> wrote:
> > Re: who is Celtic and who Germanic:
> >
> > From the little I know of Celtic languages, with respect to
"style"
> > they fit the stereotypical description of things Celtic:
> Extravagant,
> > when not downright suppletive then extremely complicated
paradigms,
> a
> > typical elite language, that it would take a lifetime to learn
> > properly (and I am pretty sure a good deal of the decade-long
> > education of druids included Pan.nini-like rules learnt by heart),
> > the kind of language students flee from at school, if they have
any
> > other interest than language for language's sake. And also
> > diversified - each Celtic tribe would have a linguistic axe to
> grind
> > with the neighbor tribe. Compare that to early Germanic which
> > compared to some rival IE languages looks like a simplified trade
> > language - a creole. The result is that if Celtic tribes are
> > displaced and in contact with as yet unknown to them other Celtic
> > tribes, they will try Germanic, much as Europeans today will use
> > English on vacation, no matter where.
> > If this were the case, it would be difficult for Roman writers to
> > distinguish which tribe was Celtic and which Germanic, and so it
> was.
> >
> > Just a thought.
> >
> > Torsten
>
> This is about the way I see it too
>
> thats one reason Celt was replaced by German in Germany
>
>
> JS Crary