Chris Gwinn:
>Yes - and quite a few scholars think that number is completely
>exaggerated, and that many of so called substratum words have
>perfectly good PIE origins that simply were not recognized as such by
>the linguists that favor such a large percentage of non-IE words. I
>would tend to agree that the number is way too large.
I don't believe that Germanic was completely pure either but I
agree with Chris. The word for "drink" for instance looks like
a normal n-infixed verb that you'd find elsewhere in IE.
Unfortunately, last time I checked, McCallister's list of suspected
foreign roots in Germanic was obliterated. Oh well, it was a messy
list anyway but still, it's a worthwhile activity. It would
be more informative if the list consisted of Proto-Germanic roots
*only*, instead of the hodgepodge way this list had been presented.
-------------------------------------------------
gLeNny gEe
...wEbDeVEr gOne bEsErK!
home:
http://glen_gordon.tripod.com
email:
glengordon01@...
-------------------------------------------------
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp