From: markodegard@...
Message: 8019
Date: 2001-07-20
--- In cybalist@..., "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...> wrote:
> I'll address your questions A and B later to keep the length of this
posting within moderate limits.
>
> As regards the Armenian migration, my suggestion, drawing on
Winter's argument, is that its final (Anatolian) stage took place
after the collapse of Urartu (8th-6th centuries BC), when the vacuum
was filled by opportunistic settlers. Perhaps I didn't say it clearly
enough, but I don't accept either a second-millennium date for the
entry of the (Proto-)Armenians into Anatolia or (for obvious
linguistic reasons) the classification of Armenian as an Anatolian
language.
>
> However, Armenian/Hurrite contacts (whether direct or involving
intermediaries) may date back to a far deeper past. I wouldn't exclude
some part of Azerbaijan as the place where Proto-Armenian
differentiated in the early second millennium BC if not earlier. In
fact, we need such a nook for it to account for its early separation
from Indo-Iranian and for the remarkably "Caucasian" typological
features of Armenian. In Armenian etymological dictionaries some 50%+
of entries are words of "obscure origin". Many of them must reflect
borrowings from unknown or little-known ancient languages (note that
Urartian is also poorly known and that we probably wouldn't be able to
identify a large number of Urartian loans if we saw them).
>
> Finally, I wish we knew enough about Thracian to be able to assess
its genetic distance from Armenian. I also wish we knew _anything_
about the linguistic status of the Cimmerians. The knowledge of such
things would certainly bear some relevance to the question of Armenian
origins.sibly in or near
> the Caucasus.