Re: [tied] Re: uvular R

From: João S. Lopes Filho
Message: 7762
Date: 2001-06-29

Is there any significant geographical distribuition? Or is the distribuition of these "rhotophobic" languages alleatory?
----- Original Message -----
From: Piotr Gasiorowski
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 2:17 AM
Subject: Re: [tied] Re: uvular R

In Maddieson's (1984) fairly representative database of 317 languages, 74 (23.3%) have no phonemes classified as rhotic.
 
Piotr
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 3:02 AM
Subject: Re: [tied] Re: uvular R


Piotr:
>I wouldn't say that apical trills exist because there is eternal
> >equilibrium between [r] and other rhotics. They exist because the
> >common-or-garden apical trill is an important stage in the natural >life
>cycles of consonants.

Hmm, I have a question. How rare is it for a language to not have
any rhotic at all?

- gLeN
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.