From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 7719
Date: 2001-06-22
----- Original Message -----From: Sergejus TarasovasSent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:32 AMSubject: Re: [tied] Sanskrit /r/> So it was not a trill in any case?Descriptions like "a very brief trill" can be found in the literature -- presumably meaning a flapped articulation. The tendency of syllable-final /r/ to be effaced in Indo-Aryan shows that its articulation has always been weaker in that position.
>>The tendency to realise syllabic <r> as [ri] or [ru] brings to mind
>>the treatment of <pretty> in American English.
> And this treatment is due to retroflex quality of AmEn /r/?
Yes, or more precisely its high-vowel-like formant structure.Piotr