Re: [tied] Latin 2nd sg. passive

On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:37:07 -0000, g-tegle@... wrote:

>I had explained the 2nd pers. passives -(a/e/i)ris as a conjugated
>form of the passive infinitive -()ri. After searching in the archive
>it seems I made wrong assumption. Is there nothing to it?
>
>I know that this doesn't fit with all conjugations, but cannot one
>assume passive endinng -()ris in third conjugation as analogical to
>the same found in 1st and 2nd conjugations?

The original form was -re < *-so. The ending -ris is analogical.

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...