From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 7536
Date: 2001-06-10
----- Original Message -----
From: "petegray" <petegray@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Basileus
> Rarely do I have the temerity to disagree with Piotr, but
I must on two
> counts here.
>
> > underlying *gWm-ti- is implied by such forms as
Latin -venti-on-
>
> Surely Latin -vention- is actually vent-ion as in
supine/ppp stem + the very
> productive morph -ion-, which forms nouns from verbs, and
is normally
> attached to the ppp/spine stem. (There are a very few
words with -ion- on
> the bare stem, eg pug-ion-, reg-ion-, opin-ion-. The
suffix -ion- is not to
> be confused with the suffix -io/-ia which gives 1st and
2nd declension
> words).
>
> > The general meaning 'walk, go, proceed' of Greek baino:
(< *gWm-je-) is >
> apparently a late extension of a more concrete PIE meaning
('come,
> > approach'), implying movement towards the speaker
>
> I'd like to dispute this, too. In Latin the meaning is
general, without
> implication of movement toward the speaker; you yourself
allow that is also
> the case in Greek; in Sanskrit it can mean "go away" in
the RV and later
> literature, and even "send away"; (meanings such as "go
to" are indicated
> by the presence of an acc, loc, or dat.). Where is the
evidence that its
> PIE meaning implied movement toward the speaker?
>
> So your etymology still has some problems, I think.
>
> Peter