From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 7468
Date: 2001-06-04
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glen Gordon" <glengordon01@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 7:03 PM
Subject: [tied] Greek wanax and basileus: A final solution
finally? :P
> How is *w- attested in Tocharian? I see no *w- there.
Plus, what
> is this IE **wnatk- supposed to literally mean? I think
it's
> 99.9% probable that if such a word existed in the IE
vocabulary,
> it could never have been a very old term because of its
complex
> (if not convoluted) form. So either it is a recent
compound, or
> it is a foreign word. If it is truely a compound of native
> elements, what does it mean? Personally, I see no meaning
in it
> just like I see no way of segmenting *septm into native
elements
> (but then this is an obvious Semitoid loan). And yet
again, we
> come back to the only conclusion.
>
> Whether /wanax/ comes from IE or not is a lesser issue and
only
> changes the immediate source of the Hellenic term. It does
not
> change the likeliest ultimate source of the word - a
non-IE
> language.