Re: etruscan

--- In cybalist@egroups.com, "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...> wrote:

> Quite simply, at the time the Cimmerians existed, the Celtic

protoform of Cymry, Cumbri etc. didn't yet sound like "Kimmer-" at
all. You can't directly compare similar-sounding names that are
several centuries apart, ignoring the effects of language change.

>
> Piotr
>

Obviously true, if the consensus is that word is Celtic. If so, is
this why some are convinced "Cimbri" is Celtic too?

Torsten