Re: [tied] Re: PIE conjugations

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 5460
Date: 2001-01-13

 
----- Original Message -----
From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
To: cybalist@egroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2001 3:00 AM
Subject: Re: [tied] Re: PIE conjugations

>I don't think a solution that explains Luw. -wi as analogical after the 1pl. *-wani is very plausible (according to all the sources I have at hand, *-wani is not even attested in Luwian).
OK. Luwian has -uni, which *may* reflect primitive *-wani.


Indeed.  In this case I prefer the retention scenario, with Luwian -(a)wi one step towards non-Anatolian PIE *-o: [and Ly{c|d}ian(*) -u].

"One step towards"? You surely mean a parallel but completely independent development, unless you wish to identify Luwian with Proto-non-Anatolian PIE.
 
Piotr