Re: [tied] More on the crummy sanguis/asrk connection

You're right about -ngu- (or -ngw-, to be phonetically precise), -ng- was a typo on my part. My example (ninguit < *sningWH-) shows -ngw- anyway. But, as satem relexes show, in dingua~lingua we have *-ng^Hw- (i.e. *g^H + w), not *-ngWH-.

Piotr

----- Original Message -----
From: João Simões Lopes Filho

To: cybalist@egroups.com

Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 7:00 PM

Subject: Re: [tied] More on the crummy sanguis/asrk connection

I think ngWH > -ngu- cf. lingua.

anser must be a anomalous development of expected *hanser.

maybe

(1) IE *bH-, *dH-, *gH-, *gWH- > Italic *f- *th- *x- *xW- > Italic *f- f- h- f-

(2) IE *-VbH-, *-VdH-, *-VgH-, *-VgWH- > Italic -VbH-, -VdH- -VgH- VgWH- > Latin -Vb-, -Vd-, Vh-, Vb- (*)

(3) IE *-nbH- *-ndH- *ngH- , *-ngWh > Italic -nbH-, -ndH- -ngH- ngWH- > Proto -Latin *-mb- *-nd- *-ng- *ngu-

(4) IE *-ibH- *-idH *-igH *-gWH seems to develop like (3)

(*) Paralelly occurs the Latin development of dh>b after u and before r. (*Hrudhro- > rubru-)