Re: [tied] Harold, the flying sheep (*h2a-h2ah2)

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 4914
Date: 2000-12-03

Actually, "sheep" is reconstructed with *h2- even in the Encyclopedia of IE Culture and by many linguists who don't question the reality of *h3 but insist that it should have a zero reflex in Anatolian. As a result, any Greek or Latin *o- is reconstructed as *h2o- if it corresponds to ha- in Hittite or Luwian, but it's *h3o- if no Anatolian cognate is known.
 
A bold speculator who wants to prove that sheep are really birds in sheep's clothing will have an easy job:
 
"wool" is *h2w-l-H-no-
"wind" is *h2w-h1-ont-
"sheep" is *h2ow-i-
"bird" is *h2aw-i-
 
... so all one needs is *h2ew-/*h2aw-/*h2u- 'fluff, something volatile', plus all sorts of root determinants and suffixes.
 
Needless to say, I'm not being even half-serious.
 
Piotr
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
To: cybalist@egroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Harold, the flying sheep (*bHeh1-bHeh1)

No, I just meant that (near) homonymy cannot be excluded, so I couldn't present it as definite proof for *h3.  I *could* introduce it as a joke, however...