(no subject)

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 4867
Date: 2000-11-26

 
----- Original Message -----
From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
To: cybalist@egroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2000 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] (unknown)

>> Why is there no lengthening in vocatives like *ph2ter or *k^won?

> The last question is easy: the vocative had no *-s ending
But -r and -n themselves are voiced, aren't they?
 
Piotr