Re: [tied] Re: Dating Sea Level Changes
From: Mark Odegard
I've been to this site before. Immensly
interesting, but it's hard not to regard it as an exercise
in quackery. John assures us the science is 'sound', but, well, like the
salt archive site, one queses when reading through it.
I think the comments of 'Donnelly' need be
understood as some sort of joke. My impression is 'he' is being made fun of. A
short review of the site suggests he's a quack from the 1880s. There are a
lot of dead links in this site, seemingly as if it is decaying. The Stanford URL
gives it more authority than I think it merits. How long does Stanford let
student pages stay up before letting them die a natural death?
Maybe he's quoting
dates from reliable sources, but I would't trust him.